Case Study

Strategic Structuring for a Property Split and Development Project Overview

A client acquired a property with the intention of maximising its long-term value by subdividing the site and constructing two separate buildings. While the original acquisition was made as an investment, the client’s plans evolved as the project progressed. They sought advice on the most tax-effective structure, the commercial implications of different development pathways, and the long-term impact of their decisions.

Industry
Property
Location
Brisbane
Client Type
Medical Clients
Cashflow
Improved
GST
Optimised
Tax
Strategically planned

Overview

The client needed clarity on several complex issues:
  • Whether the project should be treated as an investment or a property development business.
  • The most appropriate ownership structure to support both the current project and future developments.
  • The income tax consequences of different development strategies.
  • GST implications, including the potential application of the margin scheme.
  • Cash flow impacts throughout the development lifecycle.
  • Long-term tax efficiency while maintaining commercial flexibility.
Because these decisions would have lasting tax consequences, obtaining the right advice before construction commenced was critical.

Our Approach

Drawing on our commercial experience working within the property industry, we collaborated closely with specialist property advisers to develop a strategy tailored to the client’s objectives.
Our approach included:
  • Reviewing the client’s long-term property investment and development goals.
  • Assessing whether the activities would constitute a property development business.
  • Advising on the most appropriate ownership and taxation structure.
  • Preparing financial modelling comparing alternative scenarios.
  • Evaluating GST outcomes and eligibility for the margin scheme.
  • Modelling cash flow throughout the project.
  • Providing proactive advice whenever key commercial decisions arose.
Rather than responding after decisions had been made, we remained available throughout the process, enabling the client to make informed decisions as circumstances evolved.

Understanding When an Investor Becomes a Property Developer

One of the most important aspects of the engagement was determining whether the client’s activities remained those of an investor or had transitioned into a property development enterprise.
This distinction has significant tax consequences.
Generally, an investor acquires property to generate rental income or long-term capital growth. When the property is eventually sold, any gain is typically taxed under the capital gains tax (CGT) provisions, potentially allowing access to valuable CGT concessions where available.
However, where activities become sufficiently commercial in nature, the Australian Taxation Office may regard the taxpayer as carrying on a business of property development or undertaking a profit-making scheme.
Relevant indicators include:
  • Intention to develop and sell for profit.
  • Frequency and repetition of development activities.
  • Scale and sophistication of the project.
  • Business-like organisation and planning.
  • Financing arrangements.
  • Marketing and sales activities.
  • Whether the taxpayer intends to continue undertaking future developments.
As the client’s objectives evolved beyond a single investment property and towards ongoing development activity, we reassessed their structure to ensure it aligned with their future commercial direction.

Revenue versus Capital – Why It Matters

A key issue was determining whether profits from the project would be treated as capital gains or ordinary business income.
Capital Treatment
Where a property is held as a long-term investment, profits on disposal may be taxed under the capital gains tax regime.
Potential advantages include:
  • Access to the 50% CGT discount for eligible individuals and trusts.
  • Potential access to certain small business CGT concessions where legislative requirements are met.
  • Generally lower effective tax outcomes.

Revenue Treatment

Where land is acquired or developed with the purpose of resale at a profit, profits are generally treated as ordinary income.
Consequences include:
  • No 50% CGT discount.
  • Profits taxed as business income.
  • Trading stock rules may apply.
  • GST obligations are generally more significant.
  • Different timing of tax recognition.
Because the client’s intentions changed during the planning phase, careful analysis was required to determine the most appropriate tax treatment and minimise the risk of future disputes.

GST and the Margin Scheme

GST formed another significant component of the advice.
Property developers selling new residential premises are generally required to remit GST on taxable sales. However, where eligible, the margin scheme may reduce the amount of GST payable.
Rather than paying GST on the full selling price, the margin scheme generally calculates GST on the “margin”—being broadly the difference between the property’s acquisition value (subject to the relevant legislative rules) and its selling price.
Eligibility depends on several factors, including:
  • How the property was originally acquired.
  • Whether GST was claimed on acquisition.
  • The terms of the purchase contract.
  • Whether the parties agree to apply the margin scheme.
Applying the margin scheme can significantly improve project cash flow and overall profitability, making it an important consideration during the initial acquisition and structuring phase rather than after development has commenced.

Financial Modelling

To support strategic decision-making, we prepared financial modelling comparing multiple scenarios.
The modelling considered:
  • Estimated development costs.
  • Funding requirements.
  • GST payable under different approaches.
  • Cash flow timing.
  • Tax payable under both revenue and capital treatments.
  • Entity-level taxation outcomes.
  • Long-term wealth creation opportunities.
This enabled the client to understand not only the tax consequences but also the commercial impact of each option before committing to a particular strategy.

The Outcome

By combining specialist taxation advice with practical commercial property experience, the client was able to proceed with confidence.
The engagement delivered:
  • A structure aligned with both current and future development objectives.
  • Improved cash flow forecasting.
  • Greater certainty regarding GST obligations.
  • Strategic planning around revenue versus capital treatment.
  • Ongoing support throughout the project lifecycle.
  • A trusted advisory relationship focused on long-term success rather than a single transaction.

Why Clients Choose Us

Our clients value more than technical tax advice.
They appreciate that we:
  • Have genuine commercial experience working within property businesses.
  • Understand both the commercial and taxation aspects of development projects.
  • Work proactively rather than reactively.
  • Are responsive and accessible when decisions need to be made.
  • Focus on practical tax minimisation strategies within the law.
  • Build long-term relationships founded on trust, availability and results.
Complex property transactions require advisers who understand both the numbers and the commercial realities. By combining technical expertise with practical experience, we help clients make confident decisions that support both immediate project outcomes and long-term wealth creation.

Talk to an expert

Get tailored advice for your unique situation.

BOOK A MEETING
Showing 2 of 2 case studies
August 2026

Test Case Study

Case Study: Strategic Structuring for a Property Split and Development Project Overview A client acquired a property with the intention of maximising its long-term value by subdividing the…

The OutcomeDoubled
Investment
→